Introducing the Bikeway Report Card

I am planning to start reviewing bicycle routes, which got me thinking – what makes a good bicycle route?

So after a bit of brainstorming, I came up with a series of categories that could be applied to any bicycle route to come up with an overall rating.  I calibrated the weightings on some routes I know such that the overall score generated is consistent with the overall score I would have given it.

So without further ado, the grading scheme:

Convenience ( /30):

Average Speed ( /10):
Affected by the number of stops, and the duration of stops.

Effort ( /5):
Affected by hills, surface type (asphalt vs. gravel) and the number of stops or slowdowns.

Directness ( /5):
The ratio of the straight-line distance to the path distance.  Calculated such that a path that is perfectly straight gets 5/5, while a path that is double the straight-line distance gets 0/5.

Impedance ( /5):
The level of conflict between users of different speed. How easily can a faster rider overtake a slower one? Affected mostly by width and separation between modes.  

Legality ( /5):
First of all, is it actually legal to ride a bicycle from one end to the other?  This is a test that a shocking number of bikeways fail.  Additionally, situations which encourage law-breaking behaviour are penalized, such as unnecessary stop signs or traffic lights.

Comfort ( /35):

Interaction with Motor Traffic ( /20):
The degree of separation from fast-moving and/or high volumes of motor traffic.  The key test is “Would a parent feel comfortable letting an 10-year old cycle to school along this route?”.

Social Interaction ( /10):
How easy is it to have a conversation with a friend while travelling along the route? Affected mostly by width and noise.

Surface ( /5):
The smoothness and traction of the roadway surface.

Safety ( /35):

Conflict ( /20):
The number of conflicts that are known to be dangerous, such as those with poor visibility and insufficient signal protection.

Clarity ( /10):
The clarity of the layout.  Is it intuitive for all users to act in the correct manner?  Affected mostly by road geometry, markings and signage.

Crime ( /5):
The possibility for nefarious activity along the route. Does it feel safe at night?  Affected mostly by lighting and sightlines.

Overall: Grade out of 100

What do you think of this framework?  Have I missed any points that would be relevant in assessing the quality of a bicycle route?

The report card is available as a spreadsheet here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Introducing the Bikeway Report Card

  1. Pingback: Richmond-Adelaide cycle track review | The Ontario Traffic Man

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s